Rationalizing the Blame: Is it my SEO applications or is it Google?
I confess. Prior to hearing about SEO apps and site promotion business, I considered that Google was perfect. I Used Google to look for anything from people, to pictures, to current events to weird objects and naively trusted the search outcomes. Then I learned about SEO programs and an emerging e-commerce revolving around Web promotion, and my search habits changed. But even before my revelation, having done a bit of philosophical reading, I got an inkling that search engines, Google to boot, know far from all, and pass on to the web community a tiny portion of that.
My Google experiences soon persuaded me that Flikr is a better image search source, that with the assistance of RSS I can have great current events stories without having to rummage through Google SERPs (rummaging is more fitting than Google search), and people search is best managed by Facebook. It seems that when I look for obscure gadgets on Google, the results are almost always inaccurate, to put it mildly. Try Googling for SEO apps and other SEO related themes on Google and you are just about ready to give up your self-control. I mean, tell me, what’s the relationship between SEO apps and online education websites or Internet casinos? Gladly, in my disappointment.
So when news of best seo tools software and the whole field revolving around it came into my humble worldview, my suspicions about websites coming up on P1 of Google grew manifold. Do they merit to be there and whose fault is it, Google or webmasters using SEO applications. The moral quandary is immense. Do I seize using my SEO google rank checker or do I quit using Google instead? I decided that I can’t boycott Google just yet. At least not till the worthy competitor enters the game. For now I will keep juggling between Blekko, Google and the above methods to complement the SERP mess that Google is. And, oh,yes, I will continue using my SEO apps.
Frankly, SEO programs is the reason why guys like myself get discovered online. Sophisticated as they are, Google Web spiders are unlikely to find some no-name dude and position his site well. In this respect, I still am a strong admirer of SEO software and organic search. If it was all about the paid search, the multinational giants would squish me before I knew it. And there are 1000 organizations on the Fortune roll! But here is another thing that annoys me and other check backlinks users, I am confident. There are guys who buy SEO apps and use them to sell beddingon career sites and the like. What we have is junk that not only exists on the web but is also highly ranked by search engines.
What is the user perspective on this? They search for SEO product reviews and will instead find irrelevant SERPs. They get disappointed. So much for the “Internet democracy”. Does this imply that SEO application and service field is harmful? Not necessarily.
The unethical users of SEO apps need to stop brutalizing the Web but it’s like ordering hackers to stop hacking. The bad thing about it is that black hat SEOs are overusing the prospect to be noticeable on the Web that is offered to the no-name guy like myself. For now people just have to be patient with them. One can only wish that Google will put more emphasis on catching the schemers unethically using SEO software, and if Google doesn’t, the new Google will.